About This Case

Call Transcript

Signed Retainer / Fee Agreement
Type of Accident Car Accident
Contingency fee Custom
Date of incident Jun. 10, 2022
Accident Location Minneapolis, Minnesota
Currently represented by attorney? No
Was The Client At Fault? No

Injuries Overview

All injuries/treatments with a blue checkmark have been verified via electronic medical records using settLIT.

Verified? Injury/Treatment Domain Code Description
See Detailed View

Summary Of Case Details

Accident Summary:

  • On a hot summer day in June, around the 10th, the plaintiff was driving his personal vehicle in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He was stopped at a red light, waiting for it to turn green. In front of him was a woman driving a minivan who became frustrated with the long wait at the light. She impatiently tried to back out and go around the traffic to take another route. 
  • In her haste, the woman hit the plaintiff’s car with her minivan. The minivan had a tow hook on the back that got caught on the front end of his vehicle. The woman tried to pull her minivan off the plaintiff's car by going forward and backward repeatedly, but the tow hook remained stuck. She kept ramming into the plaintiff’s car in her attempts to dislodge the vehicles. 
  • the plaintiff recounted the incident: "She just kept hitting up my car from the front and she she's gonna cause the front end damage to my car." The impact was so severe that the plaintiff suffered a seizure at the scene. He remembers a police officer bringing him home afterwards, and then later going to the hospital for treatment.
  • There were several witnesses to the accident who were outside at the time. The police arrived on scene, but the plaintiff has not been able to obtain the police report in the nearly two years since the accident occurred.


Injuries Summary:

  • As a result of the repeated impacts to his vehicle, the plaintiff lost consciousness and suffered a seizure at the scene of the accident. He was taken home by the police, but later went to Hennepin County Medical Center for treatment. 
  • Since the accident, the plaintiff has experienced significant memory issues. He stated: "I have a lot of memory issues. I don't remember a lot." He went on to explain the extent of his memory problems: "I can better remember conversation that I just had with my fiance, you know, I missed out, I forget, I forget everything. I have to write things down to just remember what an hour ago."
  • These memory issues have had a substantial impact on the plaintiff’s day-to-day life in the nearly two years following the accident. He remains unable to work as a result of his injuries.


Further Damages Caused to Plaintiff by Accident 

  • Unable to work: the plaintiff has been out of work since the accident occurred in June nearly two years ago. The memory issues resulting from the crash have made it impossible for him to return to his job.
  • Ongoing memory problems: the plaintiff suffers from debilitating memory loss that affects his ability to recall even recent conversations. He must write things down to remember what happened just an hour prior. This has significantly impacted his daily functioning and quality of life.


Insurance Details:

  • Plaintiff’s Insurance: the plaintiff believes his insurance at the time of the accident was Progressive. He is unsure if he has uninsured motorist coverage. His fiancée typically handles the insurance matters.
  • At Fault Persons Insurance: the plaintiff does not have any information about the at-fault drivers insurance coverage. 


Other Relevant Details:

  • the plaintiff was wearing his seatbelt at the time of the accident. He was the sole occupant of his vehicle.
  • The accident caused front-end damage to the plaintiff’s car, but it was not totaled. 
  • the plaintiff does not know if his fiancée filed an insurance claim for the accident. He has been unable to obtain the police report, despite trying for nearly two years.
  • the plaintiff is currently unmarried and lives in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Click to see more

Car Accident: Plaintiff Suffered Seizure And Memory Issues After Car Hooked On Defendant's Tow Hitch And Repeatedly Rammed. Front-End Damage To Vehicle. Transported To Hospital By Police. Unable To Work Since Accident (Minneapolis, Minnesota)

X
X
AUCTION HAS ENDED
End date: 04-06-2024 - 09:00:00 PM
Place automatic bid
Bids
Bidder Amount Date
Submit bid
Please click the confirm button below to place your bid.
Submitting bid ...

Frequently Asked Question

At a high level, the plaintiff signs a non-binding LOI with us showing their intent to be connected with an attorney for their case, then after you buy the case, we call them back and have them sign your specific retainer agreement.

Here's how the process in a bit more detail:

First, the plaintiff signs a Letter of Intent (LOI) with us, expressing their interest in being connected with an attorney for their case.

We clearly state in the LOI that it's not a binding agreement and that we are not a law firm or providing legal advice. The LOI simply serves as a way for the plaintiff to indicate their desire to be matched with a lawyer.

Once the LOI is signed, we put together a comprehensive package containing all the relevant details of the case, including the transcript, accident information, injuries sustained, insurance details, and more. This package is then made available to attorneys like yourself.

If you find a case that interests you and decide to buy it, we'll have the plaintiff sign your specific retainer agreement. After that, we'll introduce you to the plaintiff, and you can begin working on their case.

In the unlikely event that the plaintiff decides not to move forward with your firm or becomes unresponsive and we're unable to reach them to sign, we'll either provide you with a full refund or find a suitable replacement case (however this is extremely rare).
After you win a case we’ll introduce the plaintiff to you over email and text. We tell all our plaintiffs that their attorney will be reaching out to them within 24-48 business hours

Once we introduce you to the plaintiff, you can follow your normal onboarding process for onboarding a new client for a personal injury case.

After you’ve been introduced, we’ll confirm with the plaintiff that they are happy with you being the attorney to represent them in this case, then you’ll sign the addendum that clarifies you are the firm that will be representing the plaintiff. At that point, the client is fully yours and the handoff is complete.
If in the rare case a plaintiff we introduce to you rejects your firm and does not want you to be their counsel, then we will refund you the full amount and introduce the plaintiff to the 2nd highest bidder.

Otherwise, since you get access to the full case details, call transcript, and signed agreements before bidding, all transactions are final.
We generate some of these cases from strategic partnerships in the industry and some are generated via SEO, ads, etc. by our team of world class advertisers, marketers, and intake agents.

But regardless of where this case comes from, we make sure to be in control and aware of the entire process from optin to signed retainer. This allows us to ensure that this retainer was generated in a fully compliant manner and has the correct expectations set.